Channel Killing Blunders: The E-Store
In the past couple of weeks I have been bombarded with horror stories of distributor policies gone wrong. I have to wonder how and why so many manufacturers fall into the same traps. Perhaps they don’t have a vehicle for benchmarking distributor practices.
Manufacturers with strong distribution channels typically
participate in Distributor Associations and one can surmise networking takes
place to some extent or another. If not
directly with other manufacturers, then information may be exchanged by way of
distributors sharing best practices. The
others, well some days it’s tough to imagine where they get their input.
Management teams from Europe and Asia often don’t truly understand
how the channel works in North America. The
whole concept of distribution sounds as goofy as buying hot dogs at a barber
shop to their native sensibilities. I
mean, if you don’t really understand value proposition of a distribution
channel, the set up really does seem like a massive margin giveaway. This isn’t an excuse, but it is a definite possibility. Wholesale distribution in North America is
generally more professionally developed, provides greater value to their supply
partners and customers than channels elsewhere who merely handle paperwork.
Newly minted MBA’s often only understand wholesale
distribution in an abstract way. After
reviewing some of the case studies developed around wholesale distribution for
MBA programs, our kind of industrially focused and knowledge-based distribution
lacks representation. Instead, one is
likely to see stories of food, beverage and pharmaceutical distributors. In other words, unless they seek to
understand what we do, they can only imagine our model looks just like the
local Dr. Pepper Distributor.
Regardless of the reason, their mistakes cost them plenty… money,
marketshare, growth, brand recognition and the good will of the world’s largest
industrial selling resource.
I plan to publish a series of channel killing blunders but
to get you started here is a good example
of a bad strategy:
Case 1: Poorly thought out E-Store
Strategies
Everybody needs an e-Store
Manufacturers are playing with the concept of e-stores. They get bombarded with articles and sales
calls expounding the benefits of an e-store presence. In theory, the ideas make sense. Provide customers who lack a local
distributor relationship an easy outlet for your products. While in most cases, a list of distributors
by zip code would work just as well at a fraction cost. Based on the view of e-stores only serving
customers without a distributor partner, the e-store concept still seems
benign.
Issue arises. Nobody
actually uses the e-store. Careers are
on the line. Somebody has to do
something. After all, the manufacturer
laid out big bucks to have it programmed, produced and populated. Why not call on marketing to attract
business?
Distributors
discouraged
Advertising your e-store irritates your channel. Distributors hate direct business because it
has a long checkered history of abuse.
Distributors value sales leads.
Most do a pretty good job of following up on the leads. Progressive distributors see leads as door
openers for not only one product but for their whole line card. Some turn into immediate sales opportunities,
others bloom over time (after weeks, months, and years of nurturing calls). But when an e-store is in place, it becomes
the recipient of any new leads. If the
advertising works, the e-store gets traffic.
But since most customers want someone to provide intelligent assistance
along the way, e-store purchases don’t happen.
Still no customers down at the e-store
The e-store manager contemplates business levels (or lack thereof), they assume published list prices are the culprit. Cutting prices on the e-store should attract customers who are “on the fence” or comparing brands. Unfortunately, discounting published prices impacts distributor margins. When the distributor’s customer says, “I can buy the product cheaper on the internet.” The distributor salesperson usually gets the sale, but at a lower than normal margin. If they hear the “cheaper on the internet” story more than a couple of times, most distributors will switch their strategy. Distributors who once actively sold the manufacturers product by finding new applications and converting competitive business invest their time in more profitable products (in selling time is money).
If the online price gets low enough and the distributor feels
they no longer make sufficient gross margin to turn a profit, the distributor
will begin to actively target the e-store owners product for conversion to
another line.
A word of warning to the guy with an e-store
If you are congratulating yourself on not yet seeing distributors switch your products at the customer, you’re not out of danger. Product conversions take time. By the time you notice the effort, it will be too late.
Shipping is part of
the price
If the customer gets better shipping terms than the
manufacturer’s authorized distributor, it will affect your distributor channel
too. Why provide free freight to online
customers, but charge distributors a freight fee? A combination of low prices and free freight
will “whip up” your channel’s blood pressure just as quickly as dirty deeds
done dirt cheap pricing. Sometimes, the e-store doesn’t even belong to you
Every manufacturer should have a published distributor policy for advertised prices. Without even committing a single of the e-store sins described above, a handful of distributors adopted strategies for using the internet (and very low pricing) as a tool for expanding their business.
These wholesalers have taken on a new business model for
business. They see themselves inserting
technology in place of a sales force.
Working the internet model to expand their business to the world is
their credo. I appreciate their
entrepreneurial bent. However, I also see the poaching effect of their
very low prices on the distributors who actively sell. They provide deep discounts and do absolutely
nothing to promote their manufacturers’ brand, discover new applications or
grow the marketshare.
I am not an
attorney
I’m not passing myself off as an attorney, but here is my
understanding.
It is illegal to dictate price levels. If the on-line guy wants to give the product
away, that’s their right. However, you
can dictate lowest advertised price. The
customer can still call and negotiate, but that’s another step and it’s the
banner add with a super low price that hurts your distributor efforts.
Finally…
We’ve all benefited from best practices. Perhaps some can benefit from a list of worst
practices. If you see a manufacturer who
is going down this path, shoot them a link to this post.
Better yet, if you have a favorite worst practice to share,
send to me. We’ll add it to our list
(without naming names or companies).
Distributor Planning Made
Easy. Check out our Distributors Annual
Planning Workbook:
http://amzn.com/1481196448
Comments
And yes, manufacturers can set "advertised" pricing (it's called an IMAP - we've suggested models to some manufacturers) and they can restrict geographic reach via eSales if they can get POS data from the distributor (a challenge) or can reserve right to audit sales (if they are willing to lose a distributor ... unlikely!).
But if manufacturers are not willing to manage online territory authorization, do they have the same "right" to impose the restriction for branch sales? Especially when they provide Grainger, AmazonSupply and others to sell anywhere?
Internet selling starts to change many aspects of the distribution game ... especially when manufacturers are concerned about possibly, maybe, could be losing any, some, don't know sales via another channel.
David Gordon
dgordon@channelmkt.com
Thank you for your comments. They are right on.
For other members of this blog community... David Gordon is one of the leaders in the Electrical Distribution community. He hosts a very popular blog site. Electrical Trends. I recommend you look it up.