The Real Barrier to Value‑Driven Selling (Hint: It’s Not the Salespeople)

The Real Barrier to Value‑Driven Selling

(Hint: It’s Not the Salespeople)

When distributors talk about shifting from their old sales model to something more data‑driven, knowledge‑based, and value‑centric, the discussion usually turns into a heated three‑way debate. Is the problem leadership mindset? Compensation structure? Or field capability?

Everyone has a favorite culprit. Conveniently, it’s rarely the one staring back at them from the mirror.

In my experience, the biggest barrier is leadership mindset. Not because leaders don’t believe in value‑driven selling, but because many want it without the discomfort of changing anything meaningful.

They want the benefits of value‑driven selling layered neatly on top of the old model that made them successful. They want change with minimal disruption and results by next quarter.

Setting a strong goal? Maybe.

Wishful thinking? Perhaps.

A real strategy? Definitely not.

Old‑school, reactive, relationship‑based selling feels good. It’s familiar, human, and flattering. It rewards being liked, being available, and having a long customer history. Most distributor leaders came up through that model, succeeded in it, and, if we’re being honest, still have a soft spot for it.

But that older model is slow to develop and even slower to adapt. It requires long relationship “gestation periods” that many modern customers neither have the patience for nor see as valuable. Younger buyers, in particular, are less impressed by tenure and far more interested in data, insight, and financial impact.

Meanwhile, long‑standing customers are under intense operational and economic pressure of their own. When that happens, loyalty gives way to scrutiny. They want suppliers who can help them justify decisions internally, quantify risk, and defend cost, not friends who know their kids’ names.

And when customers are acquired or consolidated into larger organizations, the rules change overnight. Incumbent relationships are no longer protected assets; they’re liabilities to be evaluated. Suppliers are compared side‑by‑side on measurable value, pricing logic, and strategic relevance. The emotional advantage disappears, often without warning.

Yet the sales team’s affection for reliving the good old days often pushes them into denial. Every lost opportunity comes with a carefully crafted explanation for why this one was different, special, or somehow unfair.

Here’s the truth: value‑driven selling isn’t an upgrade to traditional selling. It’s a different job.

Distributor leadership teams say things like, “We want our reps to sell value,” while celebrating the rep who “saved the account,” tolerating call reports that read like weather updates, and measuring performance almost entirely through short‑term results. The message to the field is crystal clear:

The old way pays the bills. The new way is optional.

That brings us to compensation. It's often blamed, rarely analyzed, and almost never fixed. Compensation plans don’t just pay people; they quietly tell them what not to waste time on. When reps are paid almost exclusively on booked gross margin, they will prioritize speed, comfort, and low‑risk activity. That’s not resistance to value‑driven selling. That’s basic personal economics.

Leaders nod along knowingly. Yet deep inside, many are thinking, Yes, compensation is part of the problem… but changing it might upset our top sellers. Our industry is full of stories about distributors losing their “best salesperson” after a commission change.

The uncomfortable truth: leadership, especially sales management, often doesn’t want behavior to change so much that their current stars become disgruntled.

So instead, we move on to the next suspect: field capability.

When value‑driven selling initiatives stall, the conclusion is often, “Our reps just aren’t capable of that kind of selling.” For leadership, that’s a convenient story because it shifts responsibility downhill. What it ignores is that most reps were hired, trained, and rewarded for doing the exact opposite.

For nearly a century, distributors hired salespeople for likability, reliability, and occasionally product familiarity. Reps learned by hanging around the counter, working inside sales, riding with veterans, and eventually figuring things out the hard way. The result is a workforce excellent at relationship building but often lacking the skills to diagnose business risk, quantify downtime, or lead uncomfortable conversations about money.

So when leadership suddenly pivots toward a value‑centric model, the sales force is understandably shocked. Overnight, none of these sellers sounds like the consultants they once claimed to be.

Reps are told to “understand the value they provide” without anyone defining what that means in a real sales call. They’re asked to ask better questions without being coached on which questions matter. They’re encouraged to sell solutions, but only if the solution sell doesn’t slow down performance or upset a long‑standing customer.

In other words, they’re set up to fail politely.

Here’s the inconvenient truth: once leadership aligns expectations, coaching, and incentives, field capability improves faster than most people expect. I’ve watched seasoned reps, once dismissed as “old school,” become highly effective value sellers when given structure, language, and permission to think out loud with customers.

Which brings us back to the leadership mindset.

Value‑driven selling requires patience, tolerance for discomfort, and a willingness to redefine what a “good” sales call looks like. It involves longer conversations, fewer freebies, and more moments where the rep risks being wrong… or worse, being quiet.

Most organizations don’t fail at value‑driven selling because their people can’t do it. They fail because they keep rewarding old behavior while asking for new results. They want consultative thinking at relationship speed, with relationship risk, and transactional measurement.

That’s not how change works.

The distributors who succeed don’t start with new slogans, CRM fields, or training binders. They start by answering a far more uncomfortable question:

Are we actually willing to reward thinking, even when it’s slower, messier, and less predictable than the old way?

Until that answer is yes, compensation plans and training programs will continue to underperform. Not because they’re bad ideas, but because they’re being asked to compensate for a leadership decision that hasn’t been made.

Time for that mirror test.

Looking squarely at your reflection, do you see a person willing to go all in?

If you’re ready to move beyond slogans and actually build a value‑driven sales culture, River Heights Consulting can help you align mindset, compensation, and field capability. Let’s talk about what real change looks like.

TL;DR
Most distributors fail at value‑driven selling not because their reps can’t do it, but because leadership wants new results without changing old habits. Until expectations, coaching, and compensation align with value‑centric behavior, the field will default to what’s rewarded rather than what’s requested.

About the Author
Frank Hurtte helps distributors bridge the gap between traditional relationship
selling and modern, value‑driven sales strategy. With decades in the trenches of industrial distribution, he works with leadership teams to rethink compensation, coaching, and field expectations so their organizations can compete on insight, not nostalgia.

...