More on Distributor Supplier Etiquette: The Supply Partner Side

By -

Distributors: customers, partners or something in between?
The Supply-Partner side of the Etiquette Story

 The whole etiquette issue is not one sided. Over the last couple of weeks we have received several calls and comments on the topic: What part of distributor/supplier etiquette bugs you the most?

This week I would like to hit on a point made by a couple of folks on the supplier side. To launch the topic, here is a comment many great supply-partners feel throws a wet blanket on the partnering equation.

“Don’t forget, we (Distributors) are the customer.”

 As I think back in time, I realize I might have used this line a few times myself. Reflecting on the subject, I see both sides of the argument. Speaking for distributors, I can see some validity in the point. We write checks to the supplier; often paying with much greater rapidity and regularity than those who finally end up with the product. I struggle to recall a manufacturer who extends anything other than 30 day terms. Yet, most Fortune 500 companies have unilaterally declared their own buying terms of at least 60 days. How can they do that? Because, they really are the customer.






Distributors may be the customer in other ways. After they buy the product they are often stuck with a plethora of widgets that don’t exactly fly off the shelf. Increasingly, distributors are bundling services and products, building sub-assemblies and, in many industry segments, creating turnkey solutions for those who later buy the product from them. This, too, sounds a lot like a customer.

 However, the argument breaks down from there. If distributors are customers, they are a special type. Typically, there is a contract defining the scope of the relationship which doesn’t exist with “garden variety” customers. The supply-partner can walk away from other customers, without legal implications. Distributors operating in many states are protected from no fault termination by 1950s franchise protection laws. Further, distributors are given special pricing, marketing support and often, intellectual property not shared with common customers.

Somewhere along the way, distributors associated as customers, become something more. When things work well, and for most distributors and their major supply-partners it does, the relationship looks more like (and I hate to use an over worked term) a partnership. At times, even the best partnerships are strained and the distributor/supply-partner rapport is often put under stress.

 A few years ago Michael Marks co-wrote a book called, Working at Cross Purposes: How Distributors and Manufacturers can Manage Conflict Successfully. The work describes the differences in the business models of distributors and their Supply-Partner manufacturers. The business models generally mesh well, but human nature tends to cause us to dwell on the conflict part.

 This brings me to my last point. Distribution is a business model not a way of life. For some of us who are second or even third generation wholesale distributors, one point must be revisited often. The most successful business models change with conditions. Distribution today doesn’t look much like it did when my dad launched his distributorship in the early 1960s. Companies filling the ranks of his line of trade have evolved to the point at which they hardly resemble life at Hurtte Oil Company.

 What does all of this mean? Well, the day we become merely customers instead of distributors is a day we may be skating out onto some mighty precarious ice. Distributors will exist only as long as we can provide services to the customer more economically, more efficiently and better than the supplier can using a direct model.

Are we customers?
I don’t believe so. We are a highly efficient, cost effective, low maintenance channel to market. And as long as we keep our competitive edge by being more nimble than manufacturer’s organization, we are special.

 Distributors demand respect. Savvy manufacturers know that when distributors change brands their customers follow along. The last research paper on the topic points to something like 78 percent of the customers moving to the distributor’s new partner over a three year period.

With this in mind, perhaps the statement might be: Distributors aren’t customers, but the real customers “belong to” the distributor.

 What do you think?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Frank, this is a great article, and a timely reminder. There is often tension in the relationship, but as a distributor we don't control our upstream or our downstream partners, and we have to make sure that we don't poison the stream with righteous anger at the policies of either group. We have to be the fastest adapters to whatever is happening upstream and downstream, finding ways to deliver value in changing times is how we survive. If we do it really well then maybe we even thrive. Thanks for this series, it comes at a good time. Dan
March 14, 2015 at 6:07 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Dance of Onboarding: Integrating New Hires into Your Corporate Culture

By -
Image
Have you ever tried to waltz or swing dance with someone who couldn't match your rhythm or didn't know the steps? It can become a clash of styles or cultures, or, worse—somebody gets their toes stepped on. A similar thing can happen when a new hire doesn't quite 'get' the culture. Much like dancing, though, skills can be learned. I recently facilitated a panel on Cultural Quotient (CQ) where we discussed best practices for increasing CQ. This involved intentional learning, self-awareness of physical cues such as body language and personal space, and the willingness to adapt to new cultures. I have some amusing stories about what not to do based on experiences with insensitive former colleagues. However, it's more productive to focus on how employers can improve the onboarding experience and subsequently enhance retention and employee engagement by welcoming people into their corporate culture. Maybe someday in person, over drinks, I'll share a funny story o...
Read more

50 Questions for Distributors

By -
Image
Last week I wrote an article titled “Six Questions that Demand an Answer.”  Sharing the article with a few trusted advisers, I received one consistent bit of feedback best summarized by this response. “Frank, I agree these are questions we must ask ourselves; they caused me to pause and ponder.  I used them as an exercise with my team to think about our overall strategy.  I believe taking the time to think about our business from an outside perspective to be justified and worthwhile.   Sometimes it’s hard to do this subjectively.  I would like to see more questions just like these.” The following is my first round of questions.  I have put them into categories to make them easier to digest.  Some will apply to your position, some will not.  I suggest spending a moment visiting these topics with members of your own team. A note:  The readers of this blog come from a variety of backgrounds, hold a diverse collection of positio...
Read more

Ship and Debit Programs

By -
Image
Special Pricing Agreement and Thoughts about Ship and Debit Programs Click here for a brief tutorial on Ship and Debit Programs. Special Pricing Agreements (SPA) have been around for a very long time. The concept is simple; a manufacturer uses their distribution channel as a vehicle to service a customer who requires very low pricing to match some commercial situation. The details of the commercial situation aren’t really all that pertinent. They can arise due to customer potential, competitive pricing pressure, or supply contracts driven with large mega-corporations. The point is normal distributor margins no longer support the selling price and the distributor plays a critical role in providing some service to the customer. In years gone by, distributors involved in these situations purchased products earmarked for the special priced customer at sub-distributor price levels. The freshly purchased (at lower than normal cost) products were either brought “into stock” to sell...
Read more