Who’s doing the selling?
Over the past few months, I have been working closely
with David Gordon of the Channel Marketing Group. David is laser focused
on the Electrical Distribution Channel. His blog, Electrical Trends is
widely read by those who call themselves electrical distributors. This is
a large and diverse group. They range from people who are full ahead
knowledge-based distributors to those who might be better categorized as
“supply houses”.
We have discovered, the issues are very similar. A
good many in the electrical channel wonder who is doing the selling. More
importantly, how does this selling impact the operational costs and how should
a distributor (and their supply partners) look at the overall direction of
their business? As suppliers continue to broaden their product offerings
and fight for market share in sometimes niche areas, these suppliers must
review and take a new look at precisely who is doing the selling.
Without a solid plan, driving the business forward is
likely to stumble. Join me as we spend the next 6 minutes talking about – "Who’s Doing the Selling?"
Let’s talk about selling.
More specifically, let’s discuss selling technical products – products that
possess unique features differentiating them from the competition.
Further, let us define precisely what we mean by
selling. There are several definitions
of types of selling. This example
illustrates the two most radically different types of selling:
Transactional
Selling The customer knows: ·
The Manufacturer ·
Part Number The Distributor Provides: ·
Price ·
Delivery Post-sale activities: ·
Warranty replacement when appropriate |
Active Selling The customer knows: ·
They have a problem (many times the issue is
loosely defined or not defined at all) The Distributor Provides: ·
Pre-sale engineering support ·
Product recommendations ·
Input into the decision process Post-sale activities: ·
Installation advice ·
Start-up troubleshooting ·
First line technical support |
Further comparing the two types of selling
Distributors specializing in transactional (only) selling
generally carry multiple brands of the same product. This
“one-stop shopping” is advertised as a customer convenience; however, this
works similarly to Walmart’s approach to selling colas. When a customer walks into their local
mega-center the company does not care if they buy Coke, Pepsi, RC, or some
other brand. Further, this approach also
leads to “house brands” like Wally Worlds Sam’s Choice Cola.
Amazon is another excellent example of transactional
selling. There is no need to walk into a
store when you can open your phone or laptop and be instantly connected to
Amazon. Again, if the customer knows
what they want, products can be purchased.
And like Walmart, Amazon doesn’t much care which product is selected as
long as the purchase comes from Amazon.
The same rule applies to “commodity-like” products and
distributors. If a customer wants a
common product where the brand is not a consideration, they ask for it,
sometimes using industry slang, and the customer service representative
provides a price and delivery.
When distributors carry multiple brands of a commodity
product, the smartest salespeople sell (using a generic form of the word) the brand/product
which creates the greatest gross margin.
It is possible for a manufacturer
to temporarily increase unit volume by dropping these margins. The issue becomes, most manufacturers do not
carefully calculate the increase necessary to offset the loss in margin. Further,
in time other credible competitors adjust their price making gains difficult.
Who sells the product?
To answer this question, let’s further break down
distributor selling. Virtually every
selling component is described below. (If
you have other points, send them along and we will add them!)
Mostly
transaction activities
·
Inventory in the right place and at the right
time
·
Extend credit when appropriate
·
Customer ordering system
·
Kitting of parts
·
Summary billing
·
Product logistics
Advanced
transactional activities
·
Assist the customer in product selection
·
Provide product-related training
Active
selling activities
·
Solve customer problems within existing systems
·
Identify technical solutions on systems being
developed
·
Convert competitive products to a new/better
solution
·
Proactively identify customer issues before the
customer recognizes them
·
Provide proof of concept on new solutions
·
Provide system/application related training
·
Staff assistance with customer
configuration/programming of new products
·
Inhouse (or partnerships) capability to provide
turnkey systems or pieces of the system
·
Assist with start-up issues via troubleshooting
Sales activities cost money for the distributor
Each of these activities costs money. If the distributor does not provide the
activity, then the onus falls onto the manufacturer. Somebody pays – it’s just a matter of who ends
up with the bill.
Sadly, most distributors have done a poor job of tracking
the expenses tied to each of these activities.
Based on observations within the study of distributor association profit
benchmarking reports, the “active selling” tasks require a gross margin
percentage that is approximately 30-32 percent higher than “transactional
selling.”
Contrasting distributor types to see the need for
higher margins
In the industrial sector, distributors operating in Electrical
Distribution (members of the National Association of Electrical Distributors - NAED)
and Automation Distribution (members of the Association for High Tech
Distribution – AHTD) often sell to similar customer sets. The primary difference comes in the types of
products sold, with NAED members selling a higher percentage of “commodity-like”
products.
NAED members generally sell more replacement products to
End Users in MRO environments. Many of
the transactions involve replacing a component that arrived in their
manufacturing facility on a piece of machinery.
The customer usually knows the part number and description of the
replacement part. Even if the product is
not a commodity, the selling effort is still largely transactional.
AHTD distributors, who tend to focus on new OEM
applications and more technologically complex end-user needs, engage in more active
selling. While they do sell some replacement
parts, the majority of their business is focused on active sales.
Profit Benchmarking Reports tell the story
margin for an AHTD member is approximately 26 percent while the typical NAED member reports a gross margin hovering around 20 percent.
Armed with this data, one could expect the bottom-line
profitability of AHTD members to be substantially higher than that of NAED
members. However, the reports indicate
the profit margin percentages for the groups to be approximately equal, pointing
to an increased cost of sales activities.
What this means for manufacturers
Manufacturers must understand the difference between
transactional and active selling. While many
manufacturers have created tiered distribution plans with terms like “market
makers,” “market servers,” and other types of categorizations, the strategies
appear to have failed.
In a special report generated after nearly 20 in-depth
interviews with highly focused active selling distributors, we arrived at these
conclusions:
The problem is many times
the situation is not black and white – there are hundreds of shades of
gray. Even the previously mentioned
companies have salespeople probing into other types of business. This creates issues. Here are some problem points made by the
distributors interviewed:
·
Market Servers can receive special pricing
agreements (SPA).
If this type of
distributor can get an SPA this opens the doors for them to block out the
market making distributor.
·
Poor discipline in the selection of Market
Maker distributors.
This is often influenced
by field sales and reps who feel like they gain favor with the distributor by
offering up the additional margins associated with being a market making
distributor.
·
The clout of placing large stock orders
from national chains.
Large orders do not
necessarily qualify a distributor for this role.
·
Customer requests by large end users
hoping to gain additional discounts.
It is the role of a
procurement department to drive unit price cost to the minimum level. Opening up the distributor landscape to other
distributors typically drives the prices down.
Citing another recent report on small to midsized
distributors in the market, we found many distributors who have become
extremely specialized in specific technologies.
These distributors have created a niche by selling a few very focused
product groups, mostly to OEMs serving one or two categories.
These distributors state they must often switch their
“active selling” direction because their manufacturing partners allow other
distributors to apply margin pressure against them at their accounts. This is disturbing because this group of
distributors is truly creating market expanding services to the manufacture in
at least several categories.
Manufacturers with the broadest product lines often fail
to realize the specialized activities of this breed of distributor. The result is extra energies are required of
the manufacturer’s team to supplement the efforts of a more general
distributor.
The time is ripe to better understand who is doing
the work
This is complicated.
First, product technologies shift.
For example, years ago, variable frequency drives were considered
cutting-edge technology, yet today many classes of this product approach
“commodity” status. Second, some
distributors fall into the middle ground – actively selling in some instances while
transactionally selling in others.
Further complicating things, manufacturer field sales
teams (rep-based, direct employees, and regional managers) are often asked to
judge distributor performance without much objective input. Many bet on larger plays hoping they will ramp
up their active selling activities.
In the case of manufacturers with multiple distributors
in the market, the manufacturer’s team probably knows the transactional
distributor better than the active seller.
Why? The active sellers often
know the products better or at least as well as the factory salesperson. And the nature of the sale precludes lots of
day-to-day distributor/manufacturer interactions.
Finally
Manufacturers who understand the size and extent of the opportunity
to expand market share in new products and technologies find ways to model and
mold their channel sales efforts to match their distributor partners. Strangely, many manufacturers do not fully
understand the value of market share on some of their products. Without this key piece of information,
decisions surrounding the cost of sales activities are impossible. Sad but true…
Frank Hurtte is the Founding Partner of River Heights Consulting. Once dubbed “the Mark Twain of the Distribution World,” Frank combines the battle scars of 28 years of front-line "in the trenches" experience with over 16 years of service to knowledge-based distributors and their manufacturer partners.
His easy-going demeanor and “Iowa-speak” make
him a relatable favorite among speakers.
Email or call today to see how River Heights Consulting
can take your distributor business to the next level.
Comments
https://www.vyaparinfo.com/looking-for-bulk-buyers-in-india/
https://www.vyaparinfo.com/looking-for-distributors/
https://www.vyaparinfo.com/manufacturer/
Wonderful post. Its really helpful for me..
e-signature software
best onboarding software